Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bacon, cooked Leader
Bacon, cooked4
VS
Pork country-style ribs, cooked
Pork country-style ribs, cooked3

Bacon, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bacon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bacon, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pork country-style ribs, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    548 kcal
    273 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN35.73 g
    26.49 g
  • Carbohydrate
    1.35 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    43.27 g
    17.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    14.19 g
    6.3 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    2193 mg
    58 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN539 mg
    288 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    34 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.49 mg
    1.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN30 mg
    23 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bacon, cooked vs Pork country-style ribs, cooked · Foodatron