Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Baked beans, canned
Baked beans, canned0
VS
Cranberry beans, canned Leader
Cranberry beans, canned7

Cranberry beans, canned leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Cranberry beans, canned comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Cranberry beans, canned for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on saturated fat and calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    94 kcal
    83 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    4.75 g
    5.54 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    21.14 g
    15.12 g
  • Fibermore is better
    4.1 g
    6.3 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    7.96 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.37 g
    0.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    343 mg
    332 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    224 mg
    260 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    34 mg
    34 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.19 mg
    1.55 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    27 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Baked beans, canned vs Cranberry beans, canned · Foodatron