Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bay leaf
Bay leaf3
VS
Chervil, dried Leader
Chervil, dried6

Chervil, dried leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chervil, dried comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bay leaf for more fiber, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Chervil, dried for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    313 kcal
    237 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    7.61 g
    23.2 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    74.97 g
    49.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN26.3 g
    11.3 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    8.36 g
    3.9 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.28 g
    0.17 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN23 mg
    83 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    529 mg
    4740 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    834 mg
    1346 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN43 mg
    31.95 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    120 mg
    130 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    46.5 mg
    50 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bay leaf vs Chervil, dried · Foodatron