Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked2
VS
Ground beef, 95% lean, cooked Leader
Ground beef, 95% lean, cooked5

Ground beef, 95% lean, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Ground beef, 95% lean, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein and less sodium.

Pick Ground beef, 95% lean, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    164 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    25.8 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    5.94 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.59 g
    2.59 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    71 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    376 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    9 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.71 mg
    2.85 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Ground beef, 95% lean, cooked · Foodatron