Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked Leader
Beef brisket, cooked4
VS
Ground beef, 93% lean, cooked
Ground beef, 93% lean, cooked3

Beef brisket, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef brisket, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Ground beef, 93% lean, cooked for more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN14.57 g
    14.04 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.03 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.18 g
    4.4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    1.81 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN23.53 mg
    39.56 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    114.93 mg
    203.85 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN7.69 mg
    6.04 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.24 mg
    1.55 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.5 mg
    13.19 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Ground beef, 93% lean, cooked · Foodatron