Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked Leader
Beef brisket, cooked5
VS
Pork country-style ribs, cooked
Pork country-style ribs, cooked2

Beef brisket, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef brisket, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pork country-style ribs, cooked for less sodium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN14.57 g
    9.7 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.18 g
    6.49 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.65 g
    2.31 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    23.53 mg
    21.25 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN114.93 mg
    105.49 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7.69 mg
    12.45 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.24 mg
    0.49 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN9.5 mg
    8.42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Pork country-style ribs, cooked · Foodatron