Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked
Beef brisket, cooked2
VS
Rabbit, cooked Leader
Rabbit, cooked4

Rabbit, cooked leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Rabbit, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein and more iron.

Pick Rabbit, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    221 kcal
    197 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.21 g
    29.06 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    9.24 g
    8.05 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.64 g
    2.4 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    52 mg
    47 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    254 mg
    383 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    17 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.75 mg
    2.27 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    21 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Rabbit, cooked · Foodatron