Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef chuck roast, cooked Leader
Beef chuck roast, cooked3
VS
12 Pork Chipolatas2

Beef chuck roast, cooked leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef chuck roast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef chuck roast, cooked for more protein, less sugar and less sodium.

Pick 12 Pork Chipolatas for more fiber and less saturated fat.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    283 kcal
    227 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.23 g
    15.6 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.2 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    1.5 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.2 g
  • Total fat
    17.56 g
    18 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    6.91 g
    6.4 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN48 mg
    524 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    235 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    17 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    2.38 mg
    —
  • Magnesiummore is better
    19 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.