Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef chuck roast, cooked Leader
Beef chuck roast, cooked5
VS
10 Lunchbox Minis0

Beef chuck roast, cooked leads 5–0 · 5 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef chuck roast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef chuck roast, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    283 kcal
    250 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.23 g
    23 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    2 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    2 g
  • Total fat
    17.56 g
    44 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN6.91 g
    18 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN48 mg
    1640 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    235 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    17 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.38 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    19 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.