Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Ground beef, 85% lean, cooked for less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN17.42 g
    10.61 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.82 g
    6.04 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.97 g
    2.3 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    38.6 mg
    34.05 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN238.6 mg
    150.43 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9.36 mg
    8.62 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.09 mg
    1.16 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8.77 mg
    9.48 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Ground beef, 85% lean, cooked · Foodatron