Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked5
VS
Beef porterhouse steak, cooked
Beef porterhouse steak, cooked2

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Beef porterhouse steak, cooked for more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    224 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    25.51 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    12.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    4.35 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN66 mg
    69 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    301 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    6 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    3.24 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Beef porterhouse steak, cooked · Foodatron