Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked6
VS
Beef tallow
Beef tallow1

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Beef tallow for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    902 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    0 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    100 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.66 g
    49.8 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    0 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    0 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    0 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.86 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Beef tallow · Foodatron