Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked4
VS
Ground beef, 80% lean, cooked
Ground beef, 80% lean, cooked3

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Ground beef, 80% lean, cooked for more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    246 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN27.55 g
    24.04 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    15.94 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.84 g
    6.03 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    83 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    326 mg
    335 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    18 mg
    26 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.8 mg
    2.59 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    21 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.