Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked
Beef flank steak, cooked2
VS
Ground beef, 93% lean, cooked Leader
Ground beef, 93% lean, cooked5

Ground beef, 93% lean, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Ground beef, 93% lean, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Ground beef, 93% lean, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    13.64 g
    14.04 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.03 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.61 g
    4.4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.9 g
    1.81 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN26.24 mg
    39.56 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    161.39 mg
    203.85 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN8.91 mg
    6.04 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.89 mg
    1.55 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    10.89 mg
    13.19 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Ground beef, 93% lean, cooked · Foodatron