Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked5
VS
10 Lunchbox Minis0

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 5–0 · 5 categories decided · 1 tie

Both compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.64 g
    9.2 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.8 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.8 g
  • Total fat
    4.61 g
    17.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.9 g
    7.2 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN26.24 mg
    656 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    161.39 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    8.91 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.89 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    10.89 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.