Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef flank steak, cooked Leader
Beef flank steak, cooked5
VS
Pork country-style ribs, cooked
Pork country-style ribs, cooked2

Beef flank steak, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef flank steak, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef flank steak, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Pork country-style ribs, cooked for more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    202 kcal
    273 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN27.55 g
    26.49 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.31 g
    17.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.84 g
    6.3 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN53 mg
    58 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN326 mg
    288 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    18 mg
    34 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    1.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef flank steak, cooked vs Pork country-style ribs, cooked · Foodatron