Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Beef shank, cooked Leader
Beef shank, cooked4
VS
10 Lunchbox Minis0

Beef shank, cooked leads 4–0 · 4 categories decided · 1 tie

Both compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef shank, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 4 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef shank, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN16.76 g
    9.2 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.8 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.8 g
  • Total fat
    3.16 g
    17.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.14 g
    7.2 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN31.84 mg
    656 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    222.39 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    15.92 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.92 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    14.93 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.