Beef sirloin, cooked vs Shrimp, cooked

Leader

Beef sirloin, cooked4

Shrimp, cooked3

Beef sirloin, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Beef sirloin, cooked: 100 g · Shrimp, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef sirloin, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef sirloin, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
219 kcal
99 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN29.02 g
23.98 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0.2 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
—
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
—
Total fat
10.54 g
0.28 g
Saturated fatless is better
4.09 g
0.06 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN58 mg
111 mg
Potassiummore is better
WIN355 mg
259 mg
Calciummore is better
19 mg
70 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN1.96 mg
0.51 mg
Magnesiummore is better
24 mg
39 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.