Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef stew, canned Leader
Beef stew, canned8
VS
French dressing
French dressing2

Beef stew, canned leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef stew, canned comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef stew, canned for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick French dressing for more fiber and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    99 kcal
    419 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.41 g
    0.87 g
  • Carbohydrate
    7.85 g
    18.79 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.9 g
    2.4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.76 g
    17.43 g
  • Total fat
    5.53 g
    39.07 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN2.19 g
    6.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN388 mg
    661 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN163 mg
    108 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    12 mg
    27 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.48 mg
    0.32 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN8 mg
    7 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.7 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef stew, canned vs French dressing · Foodatron