Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef stew, canned Leader
Beef stew, canned7
VS
Tomato rice soup
Tomato rice soup3

Beef stew, canned leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef stew, canned comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef stew, canned for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Tomato rice soup for less saturated fat, less sodium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    99 kcal
    47 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.41 g
    0.82 g
  • Carbohydrate
    7.85 g
    8.54 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN0.9 g
    0.7 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.76 g
    2.95 g
  • Total fat
    5.53 g
    1.06 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.19 g
    0.2 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    388 mg
    319 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN163 mg
    129 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN12 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.48 mg
    0.31 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN8 mg
    2 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.7 mg
    5.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef stew, canned vs Tomato rice soup · Foodatron