Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef stew, canned Leader
Beef stew, canned5
VS
Tomato soup
Tomato soup4

Beef stew, canned leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided

Beef stew, canned: 100 g · Tomato soup: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef stew, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef stew, canned for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Tomato soup for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    99 kcal
    50 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.41 g
    0.92 g
  • Carbohydrate
    7.85 g
    9.6 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN0.9 g
    0.2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.76 g
    —
  • Total fat
    5.53 g
    1.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.19 g
    0.22 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN388 mg
    424 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    163 mg
    169 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    12 mg
    16 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.48 mg
    0.33 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN8 mg
    4 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.7 mg
    2.4 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef stew, canned vs Tomato soup · Foodatron