Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned3
VS
Queen crab, cooked Leader
Queen crab, cooked5

Queen crab, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Queen crab, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Queen crab, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    115 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    23.72 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    1.51 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.2 g
    0.18 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN563 mg
    691 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN259 mg
    200 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    33 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    2.88 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    63 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    3.3 mg
    7.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Queen crab, cooked · Foodatron