Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned3
VS
Canned pink salmon, drained Leader
Canned pink salmon, drained5

Canned pink salmon, drained leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Canned pink salmon, drained comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for less saturated fat, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Canned pink salmon, drained for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    138 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    23.1 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    5.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.2 g
    0.9 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    381 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    333 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    91 mg
    283 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.77 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN36 mg
    32 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Canned pink salmon, drained · Foodatron