Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Blue crab, canned
Blue crab, canned1
VS
Shrimp, cooked Leader
Shrimp, cooked5

Shrimp, cooked leads 5–1 · 6 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Shrimp, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Blue crab, canned for more calcium.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on potassium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    83 kcal
    99 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.88 g
    23.98 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.2 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.74 g
    0.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.2 g
    0.06 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    563 mg
    111 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259 mg
    259 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN91 mg
    70 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.51 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    36 mg
    39 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    3.3 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Blue crab, canned vs Shrimp, cooked · Foodatron