Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked
Bluefin tuna, cooked3
VS
Northern pike, cooked Leader
Northern pike, cooked5

Northern pike, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Bluefin tuna, cooked: 100 g · Northern pike, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Northern pike, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Northern pike, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    113 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    24.69 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    0.88 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    0.15 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    50 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    331 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    73 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.71 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    40 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    3.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Northern pike, cooked · Foodatron