Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked4
VS
Canned pink salmon, drained
Canned pink salmon, drained3

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Bluefin tuna, cooked: 100 g · Canned pink salmon, drained: 100 g.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Canned pink salmon, drained for less saturated fat, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    138 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    23.1 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    5.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.61 g
    0.9 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    381 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    333 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    283 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.77 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    32 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Canned pink salmon, drained · Foodatron