Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefin tuna, cooked Leader
Bluefin tuna, cooked5
VS
Trout, cooked
Trout, cooked3

Bluefin tuna, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bluefin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Trout, cooked for more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    184 kcal
    168 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.91 g
    23.8 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.28 g
    7.38 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.61 g
    1.65 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN50 mg
    61 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    323 mg
    450 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    30 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.31 mg
    0.36 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    30 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    2.9 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefin tuna, cooked vs Trout, cooked · Foodatron