Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked
Bluefish, cooked3
VS
Queen crab, cooked Leader
Queen crab, cooked5

Queen crab, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Bluefish, cooked: 100 g · Queen crab, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Queen crab, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Queen crab, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    115 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    23.72 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    1.51 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.18 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    691 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    200 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    33 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    2.88 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    42 mg
    63 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    7.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Queen crab, cooked · Foodatron