Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bluefish, cooked Leader
Bluefish, cooked4
VS
Canned pink salmon, drained
Canned pink salmon, drained3

Bluefish, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Bluefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bluefish, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Canned pink salmon, drained for less saturated fat, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    159 kcal
    138 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN25.69 g
    23.1 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.44 g
    5.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.17 g
    0.9 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN77 mg
    381 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN477 mg
    333 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    283 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.62 mg
    0.77 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN42 mg
    32 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bluefish, cooked vs Canned pink salmon, drained · Foodatron