Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Brick cheese
Brick cheese4
VS
Sweetened condensed milk Leader
Sweetened condensed milk5

Sweetened condensed milk leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Sweetened condensed milk comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Brick cheese for more protein, less sugar, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Sweetened condensed milk for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    321 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN23.24 g
    7.91 g
  • Carbohydrate
    2.79 g
    54.4 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0.51 g
    54.4 g
  • Total fat
    29.68 g
    8.7 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    18.76 g
    5.49 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    560 mg
    127 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    136 mg
    371 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN674 mg
    284 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.43 mg
    0.19 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    26 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    2.6 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Brick cheese vs Sweetened condensed milk · Foodatron