Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Brick cheese
Brick cheese2
VS
Parmesan cheese, hard Leader
Parmesan cheese, hard6

Parmesan cheese, hard leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Parmesan cheese, hard comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Brick cheese for less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Parmesan cheese, hard for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    392 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    23.24 g
    35.75 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    2.79 g
    3.22 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.51 g
    0.11 gWIN
  • Total fat
    29.68 g
    25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    18.76 g
    14.85 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN560 mg
    1175 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN136 mg
    92 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    674 mg
    1184 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.43 mg
    0.82 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    44 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Brick cheese vs Parmesan cheese, hard · Foodatron