Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned1
VS
Raspberries, canned Leader
Raspberries, canned8

Raspberries, canned leads 8–1 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Raspberries, canned comes out ahead, winning 8 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for less sugar.

Pick Raspberries, canned for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    91 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    0.83 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    23.36 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2 g
    3.3 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN14.84 g
    20.06 g
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.12 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0.01 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    3 mg
    3 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    70 mg
    94 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    11 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.24 mg
    0.42 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    12 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    8.7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Raspberries, canned · Foodatron