Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned0
VS
Cherries, sweet, raw Leader
Cherries, sweet, raw10

Cherries, sweet, raw leads 10–0 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Cherries, sweet, raw comes out ahead, winning 10 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Cherries, sweet, raw for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    63 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    1.06 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    16.01 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2 g
    2.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    14.84 g
    12.82 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0.04 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    3 mg
    0 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    70 mg
    222 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    13 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.24 mg
    0.36 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    11 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Cherries, sweet, raw · Foodatron