Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned5
VS
Cranberry sauce, canned
Cranberry sauce, canned5

Dead heat · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 5 of 10 match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Cranberry sauce, canned for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.27 g
    0.57 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    25.13 g
    25.41 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.99 g
    0.69 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    22.15 g
    19.97 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.64 g
    0.09 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.1 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    4.48 mg
    3.14 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN104.48 mg
    17.61 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN5.97 mg
    1.89 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.36 mg
    0.26 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN4.48 mg
    1.26 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    0.63 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Cranberry sauce, canned · Foodatron