Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned2
VS
Feijoa, raw Leader
Feijoa, raw7

Feijoa, raw leads 7–2 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Feijoa, raw comes out ahead, winning 7 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for less saturated fat and more iron.

Pick Feijoa, raw for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    61 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    0.71 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    15.21 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2 g
    6.4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    14.84 g
    8.2 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.42 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.07 g
    0.1 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    3 mg
    3 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    70 mg
    172 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    17 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.24 mg
    0.14 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    9 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    32.9 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Feijoa, raw · Foodatron