Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned3
VS
Grapes, canned Leader
Grapes, canned7

Grapes, canned leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Grapes, canned comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber, less sugar and less sodium.

Pick Grapes, canned for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.27 g
    1.25 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    25.13 g
    25.75 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.99 g
    1.5 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN22.15 g
    24.25 g
  • Total fat
    0.64 g
    0.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.1 g
    0.09 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4.48 mg
    15 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    104.48 mg
    267.5 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    5.97 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.36 mg
    2.45 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    4.48 mg
    15 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    2.5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Grapes, canned · Foodatron