Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned2
VS
Grapes, raw Leader
Grapes, raw8

Grapes, raw leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Grapes, raw comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber and less sugar.

Pick Grapes, raw for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    69 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    0.72 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    18.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2 g
    0.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN14.84 g
    15.48 g
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.16 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0.05 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    3 mg
    2 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    70 mg
    191 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    10 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.24 mg
    0.36 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    3.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Grapes, raw · Foodatron