Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned3
VS
Mango, raw Leader
Mango, raw7

Mango, raw leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Mango, raw comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber, less saturated fat and more iron.

Pick Mango, raw for more protein, less sugar, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    60 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    0.82 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    14.98 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2 g
    1.6 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    14.84 g
    13.66 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.38 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.07 g
    0.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    3 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    70 mg
    168 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    11 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.24 mg
    0.16 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    10 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    36.4 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Mango, raw · Foodatron