Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned Leader
Apples, canned7
VS
Maraschino cherries
Maraschino cherries3

Apples, canned leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Apples, canned comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Maraschino cherries for less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.27 g
    0.13 g
  • Carbohydrate
    25.13 g
    25.44 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.99 g
    1.94 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN22.15 g
    23.5 g
  • Total fat
    0.64 g
    0.13 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.1 g
    0.02 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    4.48 mg
    2.42 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN104.48 mg
    12.73 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5.97 mg
    32.73 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.36 mg
    0.26 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN4.48 mg
    2.42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Maraschino cherries · Foodatron