Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned1
VS
Plums, canned in juice Leader
Plums, canned in juice9

Plums, canned in juice leads 9–1 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Plums, canned in juice comes out ahead, winning 9 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber.

Pick Plums, canned in juice for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    58 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    0.51 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    15.15 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2 g
    0.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    14.84 g
    14.22 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    3 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    70 mg
    154 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    10 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.24 mg
    0.34 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    2.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Plums, canned in juice · Foodatron