Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned3
VS
Rhubarb, raw Leader
Rhubarb, raw7

Rhubarb, raw leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Rhubarb, raw comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Rhubarb, raw for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    21 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    0.9 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    4.54 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2 g
    1.8 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    14.84 g
    1.1 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0.05 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN3 mg
    4 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    70 mg
    288 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    86 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.24 mg
    0.22 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    12 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Rhubarb, raw · Foodatron