Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned2
VS
Sour cherries, canned Leader
Sour cherries, canned8

Sour cherries, canned leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Apples, canned: 100 g · Sour cherries, canned: 100 g.

The verdict

Sour cherries, canned comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber and less sodium.

Pick Sour cherries, canned for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    36 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    0.77 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    8.94 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2 g
    1.1 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    14.84 g
    7.6 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0.02 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN3 mg
    7 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    70 mg
    98 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    11 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.24 mg
    1.37 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    6 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    2.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Sour cherries, canned · Foodatron