Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned3
VS
Tamarind, raw Leader
Tamarind, raw7

Tamarind, raw leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Tamarind, raw comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Tamarind, raw for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    239 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    2.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    62.5 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2 g
    5.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN14.84 g
    38.8 g
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.07 g
    0.27 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN3 mg
    28 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    70 mg
    628 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    74 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.24 mg
    2.8 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    92 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    3.5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Tamarind, raw · Foodatron