Canned tuna in water, drained vs Shrimp, cooked

Canned tuna in water, drained3

Leader

Shrimp, cooked4

Shrimp, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Shrimp, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Canned tuna in water, drained for more protein, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
116 kcal
99 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN25.51 g
23.98 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0.2 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
—
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
—
Total fat
0.82 g
0.28 g
Saturated fatless is better
0.23 g
0.06 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN50 mg
111 mg
Potassiummore is better
237 mg
259 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
11 mg
70 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN1.53 mg
0.51 mg
Magnesiummore is better
27 mg
39 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.