Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted Leader
Capon, roasted5
VS
Chicken drumstick, cooked
Chicken drumstick, cooked2

Capon, roasted leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Capon, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken drumstick, cooked for less saturated fat and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    155 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.96 g
    24.24 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    5.7 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.26 g
    1.51 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN49 mg
    128 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    255 mg
    256 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.49 mg
    1.14 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Chicken drumstick, cooked · Foodatron