Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted Leader
Capon, roasted6
VS
Chicken fat (schmaltz)
Chicken fat (schmaltz)1

Capon, roasted leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Capon, roasted comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken fat (schmaltz) for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    900 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.96 g
    0 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    99.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.26 g
    29.8 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    49 mg
    0 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN255 mg
    0 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    0 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.49 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Chicken fat (schmaltz) · Foodatron