Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted
Capon, roasted3
VS
Chicken hearts, cooked Leader
Chicken hearts, cooked5

Chicken hearts, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken hearts, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for more protein, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken hearts, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    185 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.96 g
    26.41 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    7.92 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.26 g
    2.26 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    49 mg
    48 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN255 mg
    132 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    14 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.49 mg
    9.03 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Chicken hearts, cooked · Foodatron