Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Capon, roasted Leader
Capon, roasted4
VS
Chicken thigh, cooked
Chicken thigh, cooked2

Capon, roasted leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Capon, roasted comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Capon, roasted for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Chicken thigh, cooked for less saturated fat and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber, magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    229 kcal
    179 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.96 g
    24.76 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    11.65 g
    8.15 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.26 g
    2.31 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN49 mg
    106 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    255 mg
    269 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.49 mg
    1.13 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    24 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Capon, roasted vs Chicken thigh, cooked · Foodatron