Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked6
VS
Chicken drumstick, raw
Chicken drumstick, raw1

Chicken back, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken drumstick, raw for less saturated fat.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    116 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    19.41 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    3.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    0.95 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    114 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN237 mg
    225 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.39 mg
    0.76 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Chicken drumstick, raw · Foodatron