Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked6
VS
Chicken fat (schmaltz)
Chicken fat (schmaltz)1

Chicken back, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken fat (schmaltz) for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    900 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    0 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    99.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.6 g
    29.8 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    96 mg
    0 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN237 mg
    0 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    0 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.39 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Chicken fat (schmaltz) · Foodatron